Un estudio exploratorio sobre el impacto de las tradiciones administrativas en valores y conflictos de valores de los profesionales académicos holandeses y españoles.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60583/gypp.v32i1.2152Palabras clave:
conflictos de valores, perfiles de valores, tradiciones administrativas, profesionalismo, comparación internacionalResumen
Se ha comprobado que los valores de los trabajadores del sector público y los conflictos de valores que afrontan dependen de las características organizacionales. Pese a ello, apenas se ha estudiado la influencia que la tradición administrativa tiene en los valores y los conflictos de valores en el ámbito profesional. Mientras que algunos sugieren que la tradición administrativa es la clave, otros sostienen que las características profesionales son las que determinan qué valores son importantes y qué conflictos de valores tienen lugar. En este estudio explorativo se comparan las percepciones de profesores procedentes de una universidad holandesa y de otra española. De este modo, se analiza en qué medida los valores y los conflictos derivados de estos cambian entre profesionales que trabajan en el mismo sector, pero que pertenecen a países con diferentes tradiciones. El análisis de los datos metodológicos de Q y de las entrevistas (N = 63) revela similitudes y diferencias entre países, y sugiere que lo que determina qué valores son prioritarios y qué conflictos surgen es el resultado de una combinación de las características profesionales y de la propia tradición administrativa.Descargas
Citas
Alba, C.R. y C. Navarro (2011), “Administrative Tradition and Reforms in Spain: Adaptation versus Innovation”, Public Administration, 89(3), pp. 783-800.
Bach, T. y E. Huber (2012), “Comparing Agencification in Continental Countries”, en K. Verhoest, S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert, P. Lægreid (eds.), Government Agencies, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 203-210.
Benson, J.K. (1973), “The Analysis of Bureaucratic-professional Conflict: Functional versus Dialectical Approaches”, The Sociological Quarterly, 14(3), pp. 376-394.
Bevir, M. (2012), Governance: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, Oxfrod University Press.
Bleiklie, I. y S. Michelsen (2013), “Comparing HE policies in Europe: Structures and Reform Outputs in Eight Countries”, Higher Education, 65(1), pp. 113-133.
Brouwer, M. (1999), “Q is Accounting for Tastes”, Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), pp. 35-39.
Brown, S. (1980), Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q-methodology in Political Science, New Haven y Londres, Yale University Press.
Brown, S. (1993), “A Primer on Q-methodology”, Operant Subjectivity, 16(3-4), pp. 91-138.
Clark, B. (1983), The Higher Education System, Berkeley, University of Califormia Press.
De Boer, H.F., J. Enders y U. Schimank (2008), “Comparing Higher Education Governance Systems in four European Countries”, en N.C. Soguel y P. Jaccard (eds.), Governance and Performance of Education Systems, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 35-54.
De Graaf, G. (2011), “The Loyalties of Top Public Administrators”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), pp. 285-306.
De Graaf, G. (2015), “The Bright Future of Value Pluralism in Public Administration”, Administration and Society, 47(9), pp. 1094-1102, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009539971559834.
De Graaf, G. (2016), Conflicterende Waarden in Academia, Ámsterdam, Inaugural Lecture Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
De Graaf, G. (2021), “Value Conflicts in Academic Teaching”, Teaching Public Administration, 39(1), pp. 107-124.
De Graaf, G. y A. Meijer (2019), “Social Media and Value Conflicts: An Explorative Study of the Dutch Police”, Public Administration Review, 79(1), pp. 82-92, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12914.
De Graaf, G., L. Huberts y R. Smulders (2016), “Coping with Public Value Conflicts”, Administration & Society, 48(9), pp. 1101-1127, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714532273.
De Graaf, G. y H. Paanakker (2015), “Good Governance: Performance Values and Procedural Values in Conflict”, American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), pp. 635-652, DOI: 10.1177/0275074014529361.
De Graaf, G. y J. Van Exel (2009), “Using Q-methodology in Administrative Ethics”, Public Integrity, 11(1), pp. 63-78.
De Graaf, G. y Z. Van der Wal (2017), “Without Blinders: Public Values Scholarship in Political Science, Economics, and Law: Content and Contribution to Public Administration”, Public Integrity, 19(3), pp. 196-218.
De Graaf, G., L. Huberts y R. Smulders (2014), “Coping with Public Value Conflicts”, Administration & Society, 48(9), pp. 1101-1127, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714532273.
De Vries, Michiel S. (2002), “Can You Afford Honesty?: A Comparative Analysis of Ethos and Ethics in Local Government”, Administration & Society, 34(3), pp. 309-334.
Díez, S.P. (2012), “La reforma del Estado durante el periodo democrático”, en J.A. Olmeda, S. Díez, y C. Colino (coords.), Las administraciones públicas en España, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, pp. 95-122.
Dobbins, M., C. Knill y E.M. Vögtle (2011), “An Analytical Framework for the Crosscountry Comparison of Higher Education Governance”, Higher Education, 62(5), pp. 665-683.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research”, Academy of Management Review,14(4), pp. 532-550.
Freidson, E. (2001), Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
George, A.L. y A. Bennett (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Hall, R.H. (1968), “Professionalization and Bureaucratization”, American Sociological Review, 33, pp. 92-104.
Herriott, R.E. y W.A. Firestone (1983), “Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability”, Educational Researcher, 12, pp. 14-19.
Kickert, W. (2011), “Distinctiveness of Administrative Reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain: Common Characteristics of Context, Administrations and Reforms”, Public Administration, 89(3), pp. 801-818.
Knill, C. (1998), “European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions”, Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), pp. 1-28.
Kuhlmann, S. y H. Wollmann (2019), Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Loughlin, J. y B.G. Peters (1997), “State Traditions, Administrative Reform and Regionalization”, en M. Keating y J. Loughlin (eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism, Londres, Cass, pp. 41-62.
Macaulay, M. (2018), “Ethics and Integrity”, en E. Ongaro y S. Van Thiel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration in Europe, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 279-289.
Nederhand, J., E.H. Klijn, M. van der Steen y M. van Twist (2018), “The Governance of Self-organization: Which Governance Strategy do Policy Officials and Citizens Prefer?”, Policy Sciences, 52, pp. 233-253.
Noordegraaf, M. (2015), “Hybrid Professionalism and Beyond: (New) Forms of Public Professionalism in Changing Organizational and Societal Contexts”, Journal of Professions and Organization, 2, pp. 2187-2206.
Olsen, J. (2007), “The Institutional Dynamics of the European University”, en M. Peter y O. Johan (eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht, Springer.
Ongaro, E. (2009), Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Painter, M. y B.G. Peters (2010), “Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective: Families, Groups and Hybrids”, en M. Painter y B.G. Peters (eds.), Tradition and Public Administration, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19-30.
Parrado, S. y A. Reynaers (2017), Valores públicos y sector privado: ¿Una cuestión de control o de confianza? Madrid, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.
Parrado, S. y A. Reynaers (2019), “Public-private Partnerships: Procedural over Resultsdriven Accountability”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, DOI: 10.1177/0020852319864161.
Peters, B.G. (2008), “The Napoleonic Tradition”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), pp. 118-132.
Peters, B.G. y J. Pierre (eds.) (2001), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform, Londres, Routledge.
Pollitt, C. y G. Bouckaert (2004), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, segunda edición, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pollitt, C. y G. Bouckaert (2017), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-into the Age of Austerity, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Reay, T. y C.R. Hinings (2009), “Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics”, Organization Studies, 30(6), pp. 629-652.
Scott, W.R. (1966), “Professionals in Bureaucracies: Areas of Conflict”, en H. Vollmer y D. Mills (eds.), Professionalization, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, pp. 265-275.
Selden, S.C., G.A. Brewer y J.L. Brudney (1999), “Reconciling Competing Values in Public Administration: Understanding the Administrative Role Concept”, Administration & Society, 31(2), pp. 171-204.
Sorensen, J.E. y T.L. Sorensen (1974), “The Conflict of Professionals in Bureaucratic Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), pp. 98-106.
Twijnstra, A. y G. de Graaf (2013), “Young Loyalties: Loyalty Conceptions and Loyalty Conflicts of Young Dutch and English Public Administrators”, Operant Subjectivity, 36(2), pp. 73-92.
V an der Wal, Z. y L. Yang (2015), “Confucius Meets Weber or ‹Managerialism Takes All?’ Comparing Civil Servant Values in China and the Netherlands”, International Public Management Journal, 18(3), pp. 411-436.
Van Der Wal, Z., G. de Graaf y K. Lasthuizen (2008a), “What’s Valued Most? Similarities and Differences between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector”, Public Administration, 86(2), pp. 465-482, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x.
Van der Wal, Z., G. de Graaf y K. Lasthuizen (2008b), “What’s Valued Most? A Comparative Empirical Study on the Differences and Similarities between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector”, Public Administration, 86(2), pp. 465-482.
van Exel, J. y G. de Graaf (2005), "Q Methodology: A Sneak Preview", en: https://qmethod.org/portfolio/van-exel-and-de-graaf-a-q-methodology-sneak-preview/ [fecha de consulta: 7 de noviembre de 2022].
Van Helden, J. y P.E. Jansen (2003), “New Public Management in Dutch Local Government”, Local Government Studies, 29(2), pp. 68-88.
Watts, S. y P. Stenner (2005), “Doing Q-methodology: Theory, Method and Interpretation”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, pp. 67-91.
Watts, S. y P. Stenner (2012), Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation, Londres, Sage Publications, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911.
Yin, R.K. (1989), Case Study Research, Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
Publicado
-
Resumen480
-
PDF571
-
XML2
